UnixBench – Linux系统效能测试工具

作者: | 2009-10-28
Logo

WHT >> VPS vs. Dedicated – New Benchmark Results
WHT >> VPS Benchmarks – Post Your vps performance

文章右上角有个 Search this Thread,可以用这个功能找主机商,工具的使用方法也很简单,先SSH 登入到服务器后,输入以下语句

*********更新历史*********
2009/11/9 新增 RapidVPS
2009/11/13 新增 HostingInside
2009/11/16 新增 servainet.com
2009/11/23 新增 BurstNET
2009/12/1 新增 Elite Data Hosting
2009/12/2 新增 VMhosts
2009/12/4 新增 Infinite Technologies
2009/12/4 新增 SplitServ
2010/9/21 新增 BuyVM
2010/9/24 新增 Thrust::VPS
2010/10/21 新增 创翊资讯
2010/10/31 新增 Liteserver.nl
2010/11/01 新增 YardVPS

首先安装基本套件

yum -y install autoconf automake gcc gcc-c++ make patch time

然后下载unixbench-4.1.0.wht,国外鼎鼎大名的WebHostingTalk.Com专用测试版本

wget http://acelnmp.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-4.1.0-wht.tar.gz
tar xzf unixbench-4.1.0-wht.tar.gz
cd unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2
make
./Run
cd ..
rm -rf unixbench-4.1.0*

没出现错误的话大概需要10~20分钟才会跑完程式,分数大概3百分以上都算不错的。 (Y)

另外吃RSS的时候看到 PhotonVPS 又在促销,有点想试用…不过没多少时间搞 +o(

1xen.co.uk XenAdvanced 方案 << 145.2分! 规格不错,虽然分数不高,但是安装软件倒是没什么问题 :P
点偶放大

Yourwebhoster.eu 7 days Trial 方案 << 415.4分! 这家还有提供特殊的方案唷 :$
点偶放大

2009/11/9 新增 RapidVPS

Rapid.One 方案 << 118.6分!
点偶放大

2009/11/13 新增 HostingInside

VPS A 方案 << 37.8分! 台湾人开的,可以用中文沟通,不过因为有限制资源所以测试分数偏低 :S 编译 MySQL 跟 PHP 的时候都会因为内存不足报错,客服的 Lee 人很客气,说会帮忙增加内存,而且连线速度还满不错滴~ 连到 SF.net 的 softlayer 镜像站下载有 6MB/sec,连回台湾的 nchc 也有快 2MB/sec。 ;)
点偶放大

2009/11/16 新增 servainet.com

VPS – Maxi 方案 << 90.2分!
点偶放大

2009/11/23 新增 BurstNET

C2D Q6600、2GB 内存、250GB SATA 硬盘、5个 IP、4 TB 流量 实体主机方案 << 432.5分!
点偶放大

2009/12/1 新增 Elite Data Hosting


点偶放大

Tiny Bertha 10〞 VPS 方案 << 185.3分! 这家可以用中文问问题,客服的Terii人也很不错,这家是加州WebNX的机房,另外他们还有芝加哥 FDC Servers可以选择,而且他们是不限流量唷 (Y)

2009/12/2 新增 VMhosts

VM1 方案 << 74分!
点偶放大

2009/12/4 新增 Infinite Technologies

VPS Plan 1 方案 << 222.4分!
点偶放大

2009/12/4 新增 SplitServ

Xen 2048 方案 << 81.1分!
点偶放大

2010/9/21 新增 BuyVM

15.00/year 方案 << 107.1分!
点偶放大

2010/9/24 新增 Thrust::VPS

West Coast – Xen PV方案 << 317.6分!
点偶放大

2010/10/21 新增 创翊资讯

UnixBench结果 – 126.3分!

点偶放大

2010/10/31 新增 Liteserver.nl

Linux VPS 2 PLAN – UnixBench 4结果 210.1分 / UnixBench 5结果 716.4分

点偶放大


点偶放大

2010/11/01 新增 YardVPS

LEAF 1方案 – UnixBench 4结果 134分 / UnixBench 5结果 633.5分


点偶放大


点偶放大

  Linux Benchmarking (67.6 KiB, 821 hits)

脸书回应

篇回应

24 thoughts on “UnixBench – Linux系统效能测试工具

  1. 779

    不是 是OPENVZ的BASE….

    他们的XEN还只有ATLANTA有

    回复
  2. 779

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System — Linux gogogo0911.com 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5.028stab068.3 #1 SMP Wed Feb 17 15:22:30 MSK 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs 26214400 839060 25375340 4% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 24 08:24:48 MSK 2010
    08:24:48 up 15:39, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.02

    End Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 24 08:38:28 MSK 2010
    08:38:28 up 15:53, 1 user, load average: 10.53, 5.02, 2.50

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6322660.7 167.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1622.8 195.3
    Execl Throughput 188.3 3384.6 179.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 121648.0 455.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 34902.0 324.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 865408.0 562.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 276654.1 179.1
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 846877.2 75.7
    Process Creation 569.3 10936.1 192.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 570.4 127.3
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 834844.8 73.0
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 190.3

    不知道该说啥好

    DE的MUNICH
    RAM 保证256
    25G HD
    10Mbps Unmetered

    PS SSH有一点顿

    回复
  3. 穷苦人家的小孩 文章作者

    SSH在操作的时候会顿我就会要考虑一下了….. :-# 190分是还好,不过SpaceRich.com网页上说他门机器是i7-920,好像分数应该要再高一点才对。


    779:

    FINAL SCORE 190.3

    SSH有一点顿

    忘了说 是SpaceRich.com的

    回复
  4. 779

    真奇怪 不知道是不是学校网络的问题
    昨天会顿
    现在不会 冏

    PS 我也是冲著i7-902才买的[喂

    回复
  5. 穷苦人家的小孩 文章作者

    总之会顿的话就要多参考一下其他人连线的数据好不好看了,免得才用第一个月就打枪了,会很闷唷~! FUCK


    779:

    真奇怪 不知道是不是学校网络的问题
    昨天会顿
    现在不会 冏

    PS 我也是冲著i7-902才买的[

    回复
  6. 779

    唉…..那家被我打枪取消了 冏

    明明我从日本 跟另一位ADMIN从HK连过去都OK

    可是使用者大宗的台湾却是 冏………..

    PS 我跑去WHT发问看DE跟NL还有没有好的VPS 冏

    回复
  7. 穷苦人家的小孩 文章作者

    只能多找找囉~ 不过你不考虑brust了唷? 0.0


    779:

    唉…..那家被我打枪取消了 冏

    明明我从日本 跟另一位ADMIN从HK连过去都OK

    可是使用者大宗的台湾却是 冏………..

    PS 我跑去WHT发问看DE跟NL还有没有好的VPS 冏

    回复
  8. 779

    BURST是我最后希望[喂

    毕竟他在US

    我们那种资源类的 还是放到法规相对宽松的EU感觉比较保险 = =

    回复
  9. 779

    鸟了 日本VPS终于入手
    可是效能 冏
    不知道是OPENZ 还是VITRUALZZO

    512M
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System — Linux dti-vps-srv18 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6 #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:31:05 MSD 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs 31457280 607028 30850252 2% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 15:56:48 JST 2010
    15:56:48 up 22:29, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.05

    End Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 16:10:02 JST 2010
    16:10:02 up 22:42, 1 user, load average: 12.85, 5.94, 2.93

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3415047.7 90.6
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 871.8 104.9
    Execl Throughput 188.3 2076.2 110.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 62310.0 233.2
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 17130.0 159.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 433423.0 281.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 128336.3 83.1
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 401047.8 35.9
    Process Creation 569.3 6737.4 118.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 316.8 70.7
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 347750.4 30.4
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 98.3

    1G
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System — Linux dti-vps-srv17 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6 #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:31:05 MSD 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs 52428800 590356 51838444 2% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 15:57:10 JST 2010
    15:57:10 up 1 day, 1:29, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

    End Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 16:09:41 JST 2010
    16:09:41 up 1 day, 1:41, 1 user, load average: 16.48, 6.70, 2.99

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 5367475.3 142.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 810.2 97.5
    Execl Throughput 188.3 3604.3 191.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 127523.0 477.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 25066.0 232.7
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 704805.0 458.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 203111.7 131.5
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 657329.8 58.8
    Process Creation 569.3 10622.4 186.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 533.6 119.1
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 597081.6 52.2
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 154.7

    回复
  10. 779

    也许吧
    虽然数字不是很好看
    但是跑DZ论坛是很快的
    跟nginx 也有关系吧 我想

    回复
  11. 779

    噗—-
    日本的(东京or大阪机房) 云端XEN-VPS的分数….
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)

    Start Benchmark Run: 2011綛・10纎. 12纒α羂赝..纒α23:28:12 JST
    23:28:12 up 4:15, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.14, 0.11

    End Benchmark Run: 2011綛・10纎. 12纒α羂赝..纒α23:39:39 JST
    23:39:39 up 4:26, 1 user, load average: 14.35, 6.06, 2.79

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 4205424.2 111.6
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 842.8 101.4
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1811.5 96.2
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 53816.0 201.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 14624.0 135.8
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 401101.0 260.8
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 288447.8 25.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 62107.9 40.2
    Process Creation 569.3 3046.3 53.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 411.2 91.8
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 674970.3 59.0
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 87.6

    回复
  12. 穷苦人家的小孩 文章作者

    779哥,1vCPU不要想太多了,运作顺就好了,先跑跑phpbenmark.php看看吧!应该40ms以内都算很优了唷!

    噗—-
    日本的(东京or大阪机房) 云端XEN-VPS的分数….

    回复
  13. 779

    KVM真威

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System — Linux www32319u.sakura.ne.jp 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:20 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda2 17634636 2009928 14684104 13% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 27 15:21:06 JST 2011
    15:21:06 up 12 min, 2 users, load average: 0.68, 1.06, 0.71

    End Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 27 15:31:32 JST 2011
    15:31:32 up 22 min, 2 users, load average: 14.11, 6.08, 2.99

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6491955.9 172.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1100.5 132.4
    Execl Throughput 188.3 3987.4 211.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 140710.0 526.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 40363.0 374.8
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 1087268.0 706.8
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1903029.1 170.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 387198.6 250.6
    Process Creation 569.3 10425.5 183.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 1016.5 226.9
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 4071925.2 355.8
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 263.5

    回复
    1. 穷苦人家的小孩 文章作者

      嗯啊 0.0 真羡慕~ 要不要跑5.1.3看看~

      cd /usr/src
      wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
      tar zxf UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
      cd UnixBench
      ./Run
      uname -i
      free -m
      cat /proc/cpuinfo
      cd ..
      rm -rf UnixBench*

      KVM真威
      =========
      FINAL SCORE 263.5

      回复
  14. 779

    哇哇 分数上天了
    =======================================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

    System: www32319u.sakura.ne.jp: GNU/Linux
    OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 — #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:20 EST 2010
    Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
    Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
    CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz (5320.2 bogomips)
    x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz (5413.1 bogomips)
    x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    13:49:51 up 21:14, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 28 2011 13:49:51 – 14:17:48
    2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10683551.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 2606.8 MWIPS (8.7 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 1109.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 408203.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 124138.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 808835.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 1409401.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 35177.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 5871.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2932.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 699.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 2679245.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10683551.2 915.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2606.8 474.0
    Execl Throughput 43.0 1109.0 257.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 408203.3 1030.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 124138.1 750.1
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 808835.5 1394.5
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1409401.4 1133.0
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 35177.5 87.9
    Process Creation 126.0 5871.2 466.0
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2932.9 691.7
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 699.5 1165.8
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 2679245.8 1786.2
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 669.2

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 28 2011 14:17:48 – 14:45:45
    2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16232359.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 4271.9 MWIPS (9.2 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 3961.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 210619.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 62746.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 548572.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 2416550.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 409825.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 10703.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4958.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 823.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 3918774.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16232359.6 1390.9
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4271.9 776.7
    Execl Throughput 43.0 3961.5 921.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 210619.6 531.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 62746.6 379.1
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 548572.8 945.8
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2416550.2 1942.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 409825.8 1024.6
    Process Creation 126.0 10703.4 849.5
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4958.0 1169.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 823.1 1371.8
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 3918774.7 2612.5
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 1025.0

    回复
  15. 779

    X86_64

    [[email protected] UnixBench]# free -m
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 498 446 51 0 25 350
    -/+ buffers/cache: 70 428
    Swap: 2000 0 2000

    CPU
    cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2660.126
    cache size : 4096 KB
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni ssse3 lahf_lm
    bogomips : 5320.25
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

    这下真的上天了….

    回复
  16. 779

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

    System: sakura: GNU/Linux
    OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 — #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
    Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
    Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
    CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4800.2 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4795.3 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4799.1 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    15:18:37 up 3 days, 17:33, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.04, 0.06; runlevel 3

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 24 2012 15:18:37 – 15:46:41
    3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10912231.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 2489.9 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 1688.9 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 577911.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 165388.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 820999.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 1436279.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 12403.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 5406.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3975.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 955.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 2994858.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10912231.1 935.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2489.9 452.7
    Execl Throughput 43.0 1688.9 392.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 577911.3 1459.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 165388.7 999.3
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 820999.0 1415.5
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1436279.6 1154.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 12403.8 31.0
    Process Creation 126.0 5406.1 429.1
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3975.6 937.7
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 955.7 1592.8
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 2994858.8 1996.6
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 707.5

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 24 2012 15:46:41 – 16:15:23
    3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 20871304.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 4877.9 MWIPS (14.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 5443.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 387559.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 118267.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 748044.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 3326133.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 658347.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 16912.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7109.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1232.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 5714985.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 20871304.1 1788.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4877.9 886.9
    Execl Throughput 43.0 5443.8 1266.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 387559.2 978.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 118267.4 714.6
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 748044.8 1289.7
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3326133.9 2673.7
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 658347.2 1645.9
    Process Creation 126.0 16912.4 1342.3
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7109.8 1676.8
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1232.2 2053.7
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 5714985.0 3810.0
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 1509.9

    回复

发表回响

你的电子邮件位址并不会被公开。 必要字段标记为 *

(A)  :@  (brb)  (U)  (:cc)  :S  (H)  :-(  :cute  (6)  :-#  :$  :er  8-)  FUCK 
(})  ({)  GY  (L)  :kao  (K)  :cc  :pu  (F)  :(  ^o)  :-*  :O  +o(  |-) 
:)  (*)  :D  *-)  (N)  (Y)  :P  :|  (W)  ;)  XD 
 

这个网站采用 Akismet 服务减少垃圾留言。进一步了解 Akismet 如何处理网站访客的留言资料