逆向行駛 最愛的最殘酷、最美的最虛無
WHT >> VPS vs. Dedicated – New Benchmark Results
WHT >> VPS Benchmarks – Post Your vps performance
文章右上角有個 Search this Thread，可以用這個功能找主機商，工具的使用方法也很簡單，先SSH 登入到伺服器後，輸入以下語句
*********更新歷史*********
2009/11/9 新增 RapidVPS
2009/11/13 新增 HostingInside
2009/11/16 新增 servainet.com
2009/11/23 新增 BurstNET
2009/12/1 新增 Elite Data Hosting
2009/12/2 新增 VMhosts
2009/12/4 新增 Infinite Technologies
2009/12/4 新增 SplitServ
2010/9/21 新增 BuyVM
2010/9/24 新增 Thrust::VPS
2010/10/21 新增 創翊資訊
2010/10/31 新增 Liteserver.nl
2010/11/01 新增 YardVPS
首先安裝基本套件
yum -y install autoconf automake gcc gcc-c++ make patch time
然後下載unixbench-4.1.0.wht，國外鼎鼎大名的WebHostingTalk.Com專用測試版本
wget http://acelnmp.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-4.1.0-wht.tar.gz
tar xzf unixbench-4.1.0-wht.tar.gz
cd unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2
make
./Run
cd ..
rm -rf unixbench-4.1.0*
沒出現錯誤的話大概需要10~20分鐘才會跑完程式，分數大概3百分以上都算不錯的。 ?
另外吃RSS的時候看到 PhotonVPS 又在促銷，有點想試用…不過沒多少時間搞 ?
1xen.co.uk XenAdvanced 方案 << 145.2分! 規格不錯，雖然分數不高，但是安裝軟體倒是沒什麼問題 ?
Yourwebhoster.eu 7 days Trial 方案 << 415.4分! 這家還有提供特殊的方案唷 ?
2009/11/9 新增 RapidVPS
Rapid.One 方案 << 118.6分!
2009/11/13 新增 HostingInside
VPS A 方案 << 37.8分! 台灣人開的，可以用中文溝通，不過因為有限制資源所以測試分數偏低 ? 編譯 MySQL 跟 PHP 的時候都會因為記憶體不足報錯，客服的 Lee 人很客氣，說會幫忙增加記憶體，而且連線速度還滿不錯滴~ 連到 SF.net 的 softlayer 鏡像站下載有 6MB/sec，連回台灣的 nchc 也有快 2MB/sec。 ?
2009/11/16 新增 servainet.com
VPS – Maxi 方案 << 90.2分!
2009/11/23 新增 BurstNET
C2D Q6600、2GB 記憶體、250GB SATA 硬碟、5個 IP、4 TB 流量 實體主機方案 << 432.5分!
2009/12/1 新增 Elite Data Hosting
Tiny Bertha 10〞 VPS 方案 << 185.3分! 這家可以用中文問問題，客服的Terii人也很不錯，這家是加州WebNX的機房，另外他們還有芝加哥 FDC Servers可以選擇，而且他們是不限流量唷 ?
2009/12/2 新增 VMhosts
VM1 方案 << 74分!
2009/12/4 新增 Infinite Technologies
VPS Plan 1 方案 << 222.4分!
2009/12/4 新增 SplitServ
Xen 2048 方案 << 81.1分!
2010/9/21 新增 BuyVM
15.00/year 方案 << 107.1分!
2010/9/24 新增 Thrust::VPS
West Coast – Xen PV方案 << 317.6分!
2010/10/21 新增 創翊資訊
UnixBench結果 – 126.3分!
2010/10/31 新增 Liteserver.nl
Linux VPS 2 PLAN – UnixBench 4結果 210.1分 / UnixBench 5結果 716.4分
2010/11/01 新增 YardVPS
LEAF 1方案 – UnixBench 4結果 134分 / UnixBench 5結果 633.5分
![[animagine-xl-3.1] Hawaii, USA - 002](https://520.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/animagine-xl-3.1-Hawaii-USA-002-310x165.jpg)
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: sakura: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 — #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4800.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4795.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4799.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
15:18:37 up 3 days, 17:33, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.04, 0.06; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 24 2012 15:18:37 – 15:46:41
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10912231.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2489.9 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1688.9 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 577911.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 165388.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 820999.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1436279.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 12403.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5406.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3975.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 955.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2994858.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10912231.1 935.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2489.9 452.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 1688.9 392.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 577911.3 1459.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 165388.7 999.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 820999.0 1415.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1436279.6 1154.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 12403.8 31.0
Process Creation 126.0 5406.1 429.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3975.6 937.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 955.7 1592.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2994858.8 1996.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 707.5
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 24 2012 15:46:41 – 16:15:23
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 20871304.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4877.9 MWIPS (14.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5443.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 387559.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 118267.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 748044.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 3326133.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 658347.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 16912.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7109.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1232.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5714985.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 20871304.1 1788.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4877.9 886.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 5443.8 1266.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 387559.2 978.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 118267.4 714.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 748044.8 1289.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3326133.9 2673.7
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 658347.2 1645.9
Process Creation 126.0 16912.4 1342.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7109.8 1676.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1232.2 2053.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5714985.0 3810.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1509.9
X86_64
[root@www32319u UnixBench]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 498 446 51 0 25 350
-/+ buffers/cache: 70 428
Swap: 2000 0 2000
CPU
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 11
cpu MHz : 2660.126
cache size : 4096 KB
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni ssse3 lahf_lm
bogomips : 5320.25
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
這下真的上天了….
哇哇 分數上天了
=======================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: www32319u.sakura.ne.jp: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 — #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:20 EST 2010
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz (5320.2 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz (5413.1 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
13:49:51 up 21:14, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 28 2011 13:49:51 – 14:17:48
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10683551.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2606.8 MWIPS (8.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1109.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 408203.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 124138.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 808835.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1409401.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 35177.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5871.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2932.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 699.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2679245.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10683551.2 915.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2606.8 474.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 1109.0 257.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 408203.3 1030.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 124138.1 750.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 808835.5 1394.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1409401.4 1133.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 35177.5 87.9
Process Creation 126.0 5871.2 466.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2932.9 691.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 699.5 1165.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2679245.8 1786.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 669.2
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 28 2011 14:17:48 – 14:45:45
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16232359.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4271.9 MWIPS (9.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3961.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 210619.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 62746.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 548572.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2416550.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 409825.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10703.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4958.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 823.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3918774.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16232359.6 1390.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4271.9 776.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 3961.5 921.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 210619.6 531.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 62746.6 379.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 548572.8 945.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2416550.2 1942.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 409825.8 1024.6
Process Creation 126.0 10703.4 849.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4958.0 1169.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 823.1 1371.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3918774.7 2612.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1025.0
KVM真威
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
System — Linux www32319u.sakura.ne.jp 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:20 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
/dev/hda2 17634636 2009928 14684104 13% /
Start Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 27 15:21:06 JST 2011
15:21:06 up 12 min, 2 users, load average: 0.68, 1.06, 0.71
End Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 27 15:31:32 JST 2011
15:31:32 up 22 min, 2 users, load average: 14.11, 6.08, 2.99
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6491955.9 172.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1100.5 132.4
Execl Throughput 188.3 3987.4 211.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 140710.0 526.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 40363.0 374.8
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 1087268.0 706.8
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1903029.1 170.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 387198.6 250.6
Process Creation 569.3 10425.5 183.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 1016.5 226.9
System Call Overhead 114433.5 4071925.2 355.8
=========
FINAL SCORE 263.5
嗯啊 0.0 真羨慕~ 要不要跑5.1.3看看~
cd /usr/srcwget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
tar zxf UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
cd UnixBench
./Run
uname -i
free -m
cat /proc/cpuinfo
cd ..
rm -rf UnixBench*
779哥，1vCPU不要想太多了，運作順就好了，先跑跑phpbenmark.php看看吧！應該40ms以內都算很優了唷！
噗—-
日本的(東京or大阪機房) 雲端XEN-VPS的分數….
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
Start Benchmark Run: 2011綛・10纎. 12纒α羂贋..纒α23:28:12 JST
23:28:12 up 4:15, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.14, 0.11
End Benchmark Run: 2011綛・10纎. 12纒α羂贋..纒α23:39:39 JST
23:39:39 up 4:26, 1 user, load average: 14.35, 6.06, 2.79
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 4205424.2 111.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 842.8 101.4
Execl Throughput 188.3 1811.5 96.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 53816.0 201.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 14624.0 135.8
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 401101.0 260.8
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 288447.8 25.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 62107.9 40.2
Process Creation 569.3 3046.3 53.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 411.2 91.8
System Call Overhead 114433.5 674970.3 59.0
=========
FINAL SCORE 87.6
也許吧
雖然數字不是很好看
但是跑DZ論壇是很快的
跟nginx 也有關係吧 我想
小日本用的應該是VITRUALZZO吧 0.0?
鳥了 日本VPS終於入手
可是效能 冏
不知道是OPENZ 還是VITRUALZZO
512M
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
System — Linux dti-vps-srv18 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6 #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:31:05 MSD 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/simfs 31457280 607028 30850252 2% /
Start Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 15:56:48 JST 2010
15:56:48 up 22:29, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.05
End Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 16:10:02 JST 2010
16:10:02 up 22:42, 1 user, load average: 12.85, 5.94, 2.93
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3415047.7 90.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 871.8 104.9
Execl Throughput 188.3 2076.2 110.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 62310.0 233.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 17130.0 159.1
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 433423.0 281.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 128336.3 83.1
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 401047.8 35.9
Process Creation 569.3 6737.4 118.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 316.8 70.7
System Call Overhead 114433.5 347750.4 30.4
=========
FINAL SCORE 98.3
1G
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
System — Linux dti-vps-srv17 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6 #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:31:05 MSD 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
/dev/simfs 52428800 590356 51838444 2% /
Start Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 15:57:10 JST 2010
15:57:10 up 1 day, 1:29, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
End Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 16:09:41 JST 2010
16:09:41 up 1 day, 1:41, 1 user, load average: 16.48, 6.70, 2.99
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 5367475.3 142.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 810.2 97.5
Execl Throughput 188.3 3604.3 191.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 127523.0 477.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 25066.0 232.7
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 704805.0 458.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 203111.7 131.5
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 657329.8 58.8
Process Creation 569.3 10622.4 186.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 533.6 119.1
System Call Overhead 114433.5 597081.6 52.2
=========
FINAL SCORE 154.7
http://www.pixavid.com/uploads/lmhtdz.jpg
新的主機到手了
很妙的PLAN OPENVZ 可是不給你BURST
203.8
還可以接受吧
還算不錯的數字啦 ?
BURST是我最後希望[喂
畢竟他在US
我們那種資源類的 還是放到法規相對寬鬆的EU感覺比較保險 = =
只能多找找囉~ 不過你不考慮brust了唷? 0.0
唉…..那家被我打槍取消了 冏
明明我從日本 跟另一位ADMIN從HK連過去都OK
可是使用者大宗的台灣卻是 冏………..
PS 我跑去WHT發問看DE跟NL還有沒有好的VPS 冏
總之會頓的話就要多參考一下其他人連線的數據好不好看了，免得才用第一個月就打槍了，會很悶唷~! ?
真奇怪 不知道是不是學校網路的問題
昨天會頓
現在不會 冏
PS 我也是衝著i7-902才買的[喂
SSH在操作的時候會頓我就會要考慮一下了….. ? 190分是還好，不過SpaceRich.com網頁上說他門機器是i7-920，好像分數應該要再高一點才對。
忘了說 是SpaceRich.com的
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
System — Linux gogogo0911.com 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5.028stab068.3 #1 SMP Wed Feb 17 15:22:30 MSK 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
/dev/simfs 26214400 839060 25375340 4% /
Start Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 24 08:24:48 MSK 2010
08:24:48 up 15:39, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.02
End Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 24 08:38:28 MSK 2010
08:38:28 up 15:53, 1 user, load average: 10.53, 5.02, 2.50
INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6322660.7 167.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1622.8 195.3
Execl Throughput 188.3 3384.6 179.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 121648.0 455.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 34902.0 324.1
File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 865408.0 562.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 276654.1 179.1
Pipe Throughput 111814.6 846877.2 75.7
Process Creation 569.3 10936.1 192.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 570.4 127.3
System Call Overhead 114433.5 834844.8 73.0
=========
FINAL SCORE 190.3
不知道該說啥好
DE的MUNICH
RAM 保證256
25G HD
10Mbps Unmetered
PS SSH有一點頓
靠邀！Merrypic著猴！ ㊙️ 我貼的圖片都不見了 = =..
btw 亞特蘭大對台灣好像不算快說~
不是 是OPENVZ的BASE….
他們的XEN還只有ATLANTA有
分數不錯唷！您選XEN規格的VPS嗎？聽說他們Dallas的網路比LA的下載速度還快 @@
昨天在這邊找到VPS裝TRANSMISSION的方法
今天看到這 順便補下自己的
FSCKVPS 1G Plan
http://img2.pict.com/88/17/f1/2147996/0/800/server.jpg