噹噹噹~ 黑色星期五還沒結束,我又搶了一台VPS,來自以殺很大出名的VirMach ? 但是便宜歸便宜,其機器的性能跟網路頻寬就不能要求高大上了,實際上測試結果也是如此 ?
由於洛杉磯、聖荷西、西雅圖三個機房都是走ColoCrossing線路,所以個人感覺選前兩個都差不了太多,鳳凰城是走Serverhub,該頻寬也很不錯,也算是可以考慮的 ?
效能測試
- serverreview
- Speedtest Monster
- YABS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 |
$ ServerReview_zh-TW.sh -all share clbin Benchmark started on 01-Dec-2019 23:38:33 ## System Information OS Name : CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core) N (64 bit) Kernel : KVM / 5.4.1-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) CPU Cores : 2 cores @ 2199.998 MHz CPU Cache : 4096 KB Total RAM : 2113 MiB (Free 1872 MiB) Total SWAP : 255 MiB (Free 255MiB) Total Space : 16GB (13% used) TCP CC : bbr Running for : 93 seconds ## CDN Speedtest CacheFly : 78.22 MiB/s | 625.73 Mbps | ping 0.785ms Gdrive : 20.67 MiB/s | 165.34 Mbps | ping 0.523ms ## North America Speedtest Psychz, US, CA, LA : 97.40 MiB/s | 779.18 Mbps | ping 0.603ms Psychz, US, CA, LA (CN2) : 102.07 MiB/s | 816.53 Mbps | ping 9.659ms Vultr, US, CA, LA : 85.54 MiB/s | 684.30 Mbps | ping 0.593ms Vultr, US, WA, Seattle : 55.65 MiB/s | 445.19 Mbps | ping 37.218ms Vultr, US, TX, Dallas : 58.14 MiB/s | 465.11 Mbps | ping 31.490ms Vultr, US, IL, Chicago : 33.70 MiB/s | 269.61 Mbps | ping 54.667ms Vultr, US, NY, New Jersey : 34.46 MiB/s | 275.68 Mbps | ping 67.801ms Vultr, US, GA, Atlanta : 37.33 MiB/s | 298.64 Mbps | ping 49.688ms Vultr, US, FL, Miami : 33.83 MiB/s | 270.68 Mbps | ping 56.483ms Packet, US, CA, LA : 86.93 MiB/s | 695.43 Mbps | ping 0.738ms QuadraNet, US, CA, LA : 30.47 MiB/s | 243.79 Mbps | ping 1.447ms QuadraNet, US, TX, Dallas : 7.81 MiB/s | 62.51 Mbps | ping 36.630ms QuadraNet, US, FL, Miami : 5.10 MiB/s | 40.81 Mbps | ping 63.928ms Softlayer, US, CA, San Jose: 62.82 MiB/s | 502.53 Mbps | ping 13.499ms Softlayer, US, WA, Seattle : 33.42 MiB/s | 267.35 Mbps | ping 24.710ms Softlayer, US, TX, Houston : 27.66 MiB/s | 221.29 Mbps | ping 35.054ms Softlayer, CA, QC, Montreal: 6.34 MiB/s | 50.70 Mbps | ping 68.336ms OVH, CA, QC, Beauharnois : 3.11 MiB/s | 24.90 Mbps | ping 73.540ms Vultr, CA, ON, Toronto : 33.19 MiB/s | 265.49 Mbps | ping 63.506ms Packet, CA, ON, Toronto : 12.85 MiB/s | 102.81 Mbps | ping 77.333ms ## Europe Speedtest Psychz, London, UK : 0.99 MiB/s | 7.92 Mbps | ping 129.035ms Packet, Marseille, FR : 6.38 MiB/s | 51.06 Mbps | ping 150.887ms DataCamp, Vienna, AT : 4.37 MiB/s | 34.98 Mbps | ping 160.798ms DataCamp, Prague, CZ : 10.25 MiB/s | 81.99 Mbps | ping 169.965ms DataCamp, Madrid, ES : 4.21 MiB/s | 33.66 Mbps | ping 175.557ms DataCamp, Warsaw, PL : 9.89 MiB/s | 79.10 Mbps | ping 174.255ms DataCamp, Stockholm, SE : 10.99 MiB/s | 87.91 Mbps | ping 163.016ms Vultr, London, UK : 14.12 MiB/s | 112.98 Mbps | ping 137.762ms Vultr, Frankfurt, DE : 9.89 MiB/s | 79.09 Mbps | ping 145.551ms Vultr, Amsterdam, NL : 12.26 MiB/s | 98.07 Mbps | ping 146.282ms Vultr, London, UK : 13.44 MiB/s | 107.53 Mbps | ping 137.882ms Hetzner, DE : 4.08 MiB/s | 32.63 Mbps | ping 148.056ms OVH, Roubaix, FR : 3.30 MiB/s | 26.38 Mbps | ping 146.112ms Online.net, FR : 2.90 KiB/s | 0.02 Mbps | ping 138.317ms ## Exotic Speedtest Packet, Sydney, AU : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error! Vultr, Sydney, AU : 8.06 MiB/s | 64.45 Mbps | ping 188.802ms Leaseweb, Sydney, AU : 4.44 MiB/s | 35.51 Mbps | ping 175.198ms Softlayer, Sydney, AU : 396.80 KiB/s | 3.10 Mbps | ping 176.073ms OVH, Sydney, AU : 3.99 MiB/s | 31.96 Mbps | ping 207.776ms ## Asia Speedtest Hinet, Taipei, TW : 678.50 KiB/s | 5.30 Mbps | ping 134.859ms Serverfield, Taipei, TW : 12.91 MiB/s | 103.25 Mbps | ping 135.062ms VeeTime, TaiChung, TW : 322.52 KiB/s | 2.52 Mbps | ping 140.641ms Psychz, Taipei, TW : 2.75 MiB/s | 22.03 Mbps | ping 155.899ms Psychz, Tokyo, JP : 1.92 MiB/s | 15.38 Mbps | ping 103.048ms Psychz, Mumbai, IN : 211.00 KiB/s | 1.65 Mbps | ping 260.412ms Packet, Singapore : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error! Packet, Hong Kong : 0 B/s | N/A | ping error! DataCamp, Tokyo, JP : 11.34 MiB/s | 90.69 Mbps | ping 107.718ms DataCamp, Singapore : 7.94 MiB/s | 63.49 Mbps | ping 167.790ms Vultr, Tokyo, JP : 16.83 MiB/s | 134.67 Mbps | ping 116.024ms Vultr, Singapore : 7.66 MiB/s | 61.28 Mbps | ping 167.614ms Leaseweb, Hong Kong : 3.40 MiB/s | 27.21 Mbps | ping 164.388ms Leaseweb, Singapore : 9.33 MiB/s | 74.61 Mbps | ping 159.113ms OVH, Singapore : 4.84 MiB/s | 38.74 Mbps | ping 182.669ms ## IO Test CPU Speed: bzip2 512MB - bzip2 not found on system. sha256 512MB - 81.3 MB/s md5sum 512MB - 193 MB/s Disk Speed (512MB): I/O Speed - 115 MB/s I/O Direct - 48.7 MB/s RAM Speed (1024MB): Avg. write - 1536.0 MB/s Avg. read - 3140.3 MB/s Benchmark finished in 262 seconds results saved on /root/bench.log Share result: https://clbin.com/tJ1VY |
網速測試

除了中國大陸的PING值不穩,其餘地區都還是很不錯的? ? ?
- 中華民國
- 美國
- 中國大陸
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 |
Speedtest Monster v.1.4.6 2019-11-09 Region: Taiwan https://bench.monster/speedtest.html Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -Taiwan --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ### {中華民國}網路速度測試 Location Upload Download Ping --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 臺北市 (中華電信) 71.68 Mbit/s 33.18 Mbit/s 144.451 ms 臺北市 (是方電訊) 90.74 Mbit/s 41.74 Mbit/s 140.931 ms 臺北市 (BGP Network) 22.76 Mbit/s 61.01 Mbit/s 221.478 ms 臺北市 (臺灣智慧光網) 86.48 Mbit/s 53.59 Mbit/s 126.064 ms 臺北市 (中嘉寬頻) 88.10 Mbit/s 138.62 Mbit/s 132.884 ms 臺北市 (臺灣大寬頻) 80.16 Mbit/s 46.42 Mbit/s 146.622 ms 臺北市 (臺灣固網) 94.66 Mbit/s 47.22 Mbit/s 136.333 ms 臺北市 (凱擘大寬頻) 62.90 Mbit/s 18.16 Mbit/s 170.680 ms 臺北市 (和宇寬頻) 70.34 Mbit/s 41.00 Mbit/s ping error! 臺北市 (北都數位) 90.04 Mbit/s 41.13 Mbit/s 147.214 ms 桃園市 (中嘉寬頻) 118.61 Mbit/s 163.36 Mbit/s 150.335 ms 臺中市 (中華電信) 62.93 Mbit/s 26.05 Mbit/s 154.320 ms 臺中市 (是方電訊) 76.04 Mbit/s 36.40 Mbit/s 136.586 ms 臺中市 (台灣寬頻 TBC) 105.39 Mbit/s 52.93 Mbit/s 136.912 ms 臺中市 (逢甲大學) 27.58 Mbit/s 72.21 Mbit/s 161.037 ms 高雄市 (中華電信) 70.56 Mbit/s 36.34 Mbit/s 140.953 ms 高雄市 (是方電訊) 78.59 Mbit/s 35.46 Mbit/s 145.479 ms 基隆市 (遠傳電信) 80.82 Mbit/s 34.87 Mbit/s ping error! 花蓮市 (是方電訊) 74.69 Mbit/s 34.77 Mbit/s 146.452 ms 臺東市 (是方電訊) 73.19 Mbit/s 36.85 Mbit/s 148.868 ms --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Timestamp : 2019-12-02 06:03:40 UTC ### 分享測試結果: - https://clbin.com/nMsRT |
推薦方案
- KVM-Special-1
- KVM-Special-2
- KVM-Special-4
- CPU:1 vCore @ 2GHz+
- 記憶體:1GB
- 硬碟空間:25GB SSD
- 網路流量:1TB @ 1Gbps
- IPv4:1
- 控制台:SolusVM
- 洛杉磯 Looking Glass
- AS36352, ColoCrossing
- PeeringDB
- BGPview
- 購買連結 – KVM-Special-1
- 年租費:$19.76 USD (約$608 NTD)
ref.
- CA, 洛杉磯 Looking Glass | AS36352, ColoCrossing
- CA, 聖荷西 Looking Glass | AS36352, ColoCrossing
- WA, 西雅圖 Looking Glass | AS36352, ColoCrossing
- AZ, 鳳凰城 Looking Glass | AS62904, Serverhub
- TX, 達拉斯 Looking Glass | AS36352, ColoCrossing
- IL, 芝加哥 Looking Glass | AS36352, ColoCrossing
- NY, 水牛城 Looking Glass | AS36352, ColoCrossing
- VirMach – Test IP & Looking Glass Locations
