UnixBench – Linux系統效能測試工具

作者: | 2009-10-28
Logo

WHT >> VPS vs. Dedicated – New Benchmark Results
WHT >> VPS Benchmarks – Post Your vps performance

文章右上角有個 Search this Thread,可以用這個功能找主機商,工具的使用方法也很簡單,先SSH 登入到伺服器後,輸入以下語句

*********更新歷史*********
2009/11/9 新增 RapidVPS
2009/11/13 新增 HostingInside
2009/11/16 新增 servainet.com
2009/11/23 新增 BurstNET
2009/12/1 新增 Elite Data Hosting
2009/12/2 新增 VMhosts
2009/12/4 新增 Infinite Technologies
2009/12/4 新增 SplitServ
2010/9/21 新增 BuyVM
2010/9/24 新增 Thrust::VPS
2010/10/21 新增 創翊資訊
2010/10/31 新增 Liteserver.nl
2010/11/01 新增 YardVPS

首先安裝基本套件

yum -y install autoconf automake gcc gcc-c++ make patch time

然後下載unixbench-4.1.0.wht,國外鼎鼎大名的WebHostingTalk.Com專用測試版本

wget http://acelnmp.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-4.1.0-wht.tar.gz
tar xzf unixbench-4.1.0-wht.tar.gz
cd unixbench-4.1.0-wht-2
make
./Run
cd ..
rm -rf unixbench-4.1.0*

沒出現錯誤的話大概需要10~20分鐘才會跑完程式,分數大概3百分以上都算不錯的。 (Y)

另外吃RSS的時候看到 PhotonVPS 又在促銷,有點想試用…不過沒多少時間搞 +o(

1xen.co.uk XenAdvanced 方案 << 145.2分! 規格不錯,雖然分數不高,但是安裝軟體倒是沒什麼問題 :P
點偶放大

Yourwebhoster.eu 7 days Trial 方案 << 415.4分! 這家還有提供特殊的方案唷 :$
點偶放大

2009/11/9 新增 RapidVPS

Rapid.One 方案 << 118.6分!
點偶放大

2009/11/13 新增 HostingInside

VPS A 方案 << 37.8分! 台灣人開的,可以用中文溝通,不過因為有限制資源所以測試分數偏低 :S 編譯 MySQL 跟 PHP 的時候都會因為記憶體不足報錯,客服的 Lee 人很客氣,說會幫忙增加記憶體,而且連線速度還滿不錯滴~ 連到 SF.net 的 softlayer 鏡像站下載有 6MB/sec,連回台灣的 nchc 也有快 2MB/sec。 ;)
點偶放大

2009/11/16 新增 servainet.com

VPS – Maxi 方案 << 90.2分!
點偶放大

2009/11/23 新增 BurstNET

C2D Q6600、2GB 記憶體、250GB SATA 硬碟、5個 IP、4 TB 流量 實體主機方案 << 432.5分!
點偶放大

2009/12/1 新增 Elite Data Hosting


點偶放大

Tiny Bertha 10〞 VPS 方案 << 185.3分! 這家可以用中文問問題,客服的Terii人也很不錯,這家是加州WebNX的機房,另外他們還有芝加哥 FDC Servers可以選擇,而且他們是不限流量唷 (Y)

2009/12/2 新增 VMhosts

VM1 方案 << 74分!
點偶放大

2009/12/4 新增 Infinite Technologies

VPS Plan 1 方案 << 222.4分!
點偶放大

2009/12/4 新增 SplitServ

Xen 2048 方案 << 81.1分!
點偶放大

2010/9/21 新增 BuyVM

15.00/year 方案 << 107.1分!
點偶放大

2010/9/24 新增 Thrust::VPS

West Coast – Xen PV方案 << 317.6分!
點偶放大

2010/10/21 新增 創翊資訊

UnixBench結果 – 126.3分!

點偶放大

2010/10/31 新增 Liteserver.nl

Linux VPS 2 PLAN – UnixBench 4結果 210.1分 / UnixBench 5結果 716.4分

點偶放大


點偶放大

2010/11/01 新增 YardVPS

LEAF 1方案 – UnixBench 4結果 134分 / UnixBench 5結果 633.5分


點偶放大


點偶放大

  Linux Benchmarking (67.6 KiB, 719 hits)

臉書回應

篇回應

24 thoughts on “UnixBench – Linux系統效能測試工具

  1. 779

    不是 是OPENVZ的BASE….

    他們的XEN還只有ATLANTA有

    回覆
  2. 779

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System — Linux gogogo0911.com 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5.028stab068.3 #1 SMP Wed Feb 17 15:22:30 MSK 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs 26214400 839060 25375340 4% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 24 08:24:48 MSK 2010
    08:24:48 up 15:39, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.07, 0.02

    End Benchmark Run: Wed Mar 24 08:38:28 MSK 2010
    08:38:28 up 15:53, 1 user, load average: 10.53, 5.02, 2.50

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6322660.7 167.8
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1622.8 195.3
    Execl Throughput 188.3 3384.6 179.7
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 121648.0 455.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 34902.0 324.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 865408.0 562.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 276654.1 179.1
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 846877.2 75.7
    Process Creation 569.3 10936.1 192.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 570.4 127.3
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 834844.8 73.0
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 190.3

    不知道該說啥好

    DE的MUNICH
    RAM 保證256
    25G HD
    10Mbps Unmetered

    PS SSH有一點頓

    回覆
  3. 窮苦人家的小孩 文章作者

    SSH在操作的時候會頓我就會要考慮一下了….. :-# 190分是還好,不過SpaceRich.com網頁上說他門機器是i7-920,好像分數應該要再高一點才對。


    779:

    FINAL SCORE 190.3

    SSH有一點頓

    忘了說 是SpaceRich.com的

    回覆
  4. 779

    真奇怪 不知道是不是學校網路的問題
    昨天會頓
    現在不會 冏

    PS 我也是衝著i7-902才買的[喂

    回覆
  5. 窮苦人家的小孩 文章作者

    總之會頓的話就要多參考一下其他人連線的數據好不好看了,免得才用第一個月就打槍了,會很悶唷~! FUCK


    779:

    真奇怪 不知道是不是學校網路的問題
    昨天會頓
    現在不會 冏

    PS 我也是衝著i7-902才買的[

    回覆
  6. 779

    唉…..那家被我打槍取消了 冏

    明明我從日本 跟另一位ADMIN從HK連過去都OK

    可是使用者大宗的台灣卻是 冏………..

    PS 我跑去WHT發問看DE跟NL還有沒有好的VPS 冏

    回覆
  7. 窮苦人家的小孩 文章作者

    只能多找找囉~ 不過你不考慮brust了唷? 0.0


    779:

    唉…..那家被我打槍取消了 冏

    明明我從日本 跟另一位ADMIN從HK連過去都OK

    可是使用者大宗的台灣卻是 冏………..

    PS 我跑去WHT發問看DE跟NL還有沒有好的VPS 冏

    回覆
  8. 779

    BURST是我最後希望[喂

    畢竟他在US

    我們那種資源類的 還是放到法規相對寬鬆的EU感覺比較保險 = =

    回覆
  9. 779

    鳥了 日本VPS終於入手
    可是效能 冏
    不知道是OPENZ 還是VITRUALZZO

    512M
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System — Linux dti-vps-srv18 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6 #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:31:05 MSD 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs 31457280 607028 30850252 2% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 15:56:48 JST 2010
    15:56:48 up 22:29, 1 user, load average: 0.17, 0.12, 0.05

    End Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 16:10:02 JST 2010
    16:10:02 up 22:42, 1 user, load average: 12.85, 5.94, 2.93

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 3415047.7 90.6
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 871.8 104.9
    Execl Throughput 188.3 2076.2 110.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 62310.0 233.2
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 17130.0 159.1
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 433423.0 281.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 128336.3 83.1
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 401047.8 35.9
    Process Creation 569.3 6737.4 118.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 316.8 70.7
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 347750.4 30.4
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 98.3

    1G
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System — Linux dti-vps-srv17 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6 #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:31:05 MSD 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    /dev/simfs 52428800 590356 51838444 2% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 15:57:10 JST 2010
    15:57:10 up 1 day, 1:29, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00

    End Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 25 16:09:41 JST 2010
    16:09:41 up 1 day, 1:41, 1 user, load average: 16.48, 6.70, 2.99

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 5367475.3 142.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 810.2 97.5
    Execl Throughput 188.3 3604.3 191.4
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 127523.0 477.3
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 25066.0 232.7
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 704805.0 458.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 203111.7 131.5
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 657329.8 58.8
    Process Creation 569.3 10622.4 186.6
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 533.6 119.1
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 597081.6 52.2
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 154.7

    回覆
  10. 779

    也許吧
    雖然數字不是很好看
    但是跑DZ論壇是很快的
    跟nginx 也有關係吧 我想

    回覆
  11. 779

    噗—-
    日本的(東京or大阪機房) 雲端XEN-VPS的分數….
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)

    Start Benchmark Run: 2011綛・10纎. 12纒α羂贋..纒α23:28:12 JST
    23:28:12 up 4:15, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.14, 0.11

    End Benchmark Run: 2011綛・10纎. 12纒α羂贋..纒α23:39:39 JST
    23:39:39 up 4:26, 1 user, load average: 14.35, 6.06, 2.79

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 4205424.2 111.6
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 842.8 101.4
    Execl Throughput 188.3 1811.5 96.2
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 53816.0 201.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 14624.0 135.8
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 401101.0 260.8
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 288447.8 25.8
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 62107.9 40.2
    Process Creation 569.3 3046.3 53.5
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 411.2 91.8
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 674970.3 59.0
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 87.6

    回覆
  12. 窮苦人家的小孩 文章作者

    779哥,1vCPU不要想太多了,運作順就好了,先跑跑phpbenmark.php看看吧!應該40ms以內都算很優了唷!

    噗—-
    日本的(東京or大阪機房) 雲端XEN-VPS的分數….

    回覆
  13. 779

    KVM真威

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.2)
    System — Linux www32319u.sakura.ne.jp 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:20 EST 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    /dev/hda2 17634636 2009928 14684104 13% /

    Start Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 27 15:21:06 JST 2011
    15:21:06 up 12 min, 2 users, load average: 0.68, 1.06, 0.71

    End Benchmark Run: Thu Oct 27 15:31:32 JST 2011
    15:31:32 up 22 min, 2 users, load average: 14.11, 6.08, 2.99

    INDEX VALUES
    TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 376783.7 6491955.9 172.3
    Double-Precision Whetstone 83.1 1100.5 132.4
    Execl Throughput 188.3 3987.4 211.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 2672.0 140710.0 526.6
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1077.0 40363.0 374.8
    File Read 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 15382.0 1087268.0 706.8
    Pipe Throughput 111814.6 1903029.1 170.2
    Pipe-based Context Switching 15448.6 387198.6 250.6
    Process Creation 569.3 10425.5 183.1
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 44.8 1016.5 226.9
    System Call Overhead 114433.5 4071925.2 355.8
    =========
    FINAL SCORE 263.5

    回覆
    1. 窮苦人家的小孩 文章作者

      嗯啊 0.0 真羨慕~ 要不要跑5.1.3看看~

      cd /usr/src
      wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
      tar zxf UnixBench5.1.3.tgz
      cd UnixBench
      ./Run
      uname -i
      free -m
      cat /proc/cpuinfo
      cd ..
      rm -rf UnixBench*

      KVM真威
      =========
      FINAL SCORE 263.5

      回覆
  14. 779

    哇哇 分數上天了
    =======================================================================
    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

    System: www32319u.sakura.ne.jp: GNU/Linux
    OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 — #1 SMP Tue Nov 9 12:54:20 EST 2010
    Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
    Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
    CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz (5320.2 bogomips)
    x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz (5413.1 bogomips)
    x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    13:49:51 up 21:14, 1 user, load average: 0.06, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 28 2011 13:49:51 – 14:17:48
    2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10683551.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 2606.8 MWIPS (8.7 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 1109.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 408203.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 124138.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 808835.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 1409401.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 35177.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 5871.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2932.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 699.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 2679245.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10683551.2 915.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2606.8 474.0
    Execl Throughput 43.0 1109.0 257.9
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 408203.3 1030.8
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 124138.1 750.1
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 808835.5 1394.5
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1409401.4 1133.0
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 35177.5 87.9
    Process Creation 126.0 5871.2 466.0
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2932.9 691.7
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 699.5 1165.8
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 2679245.8 1786.2
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 669.2

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Fri Oct 28 2011 14:17:48 – 14:45:45
    2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 16232359.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 4271.9 MWIPS (9.2 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 3961.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 210619.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 62746.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 548572.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 2416550.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 409825.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 10703.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4958.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 823.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 3918774.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 16232359.6 1390.9
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4271.9 776.7
    Execl Throughput 43.0 3961.5 921.3
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 210619.6 531.9
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 62746.6 379.1
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 548572.8 945.8
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2416550.2 1942.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 409825.8 1024.6
    Process Creation 126.0 10703.4 849.5
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4958.0 1169.3
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 823.1 1371.8
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 3918774.7 2612.5
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 1025.0

    回覆
  15. 779

    X86_64

    [root@www32319u UnixBench]# free -m
    total used free shared buffers cached
    Mem: 498 446 51 0 25 350
    -/+ buffers/cache: 70 428
    Swap: 2000 0 2000

    CPU
    cat /proc/cpuinfo
    processor : 0
    vendor_id : GenuineIntel
    cpu family : 6
    model : 15
    model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz
    stepping : 11
    cpu MHz : 2660.126
    cache size : 4096 KB
    fpu : yes
    fpu_exception : yes
    cpuid level : 10
    wp : yes
    flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni ssse3 lahf_lm
    bogomips : 5320.25
    clflush size : 64
    cache_alignment : 64
    address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
    power management:

    這下真的上天了….

    回覆
  16. 779

    BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

    System: sakura: GNU/Linux
    OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 — #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 04:16:51 EST 2012
    Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
    Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
    CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4800.2 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4795.3 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 (4799.1 bogomips)
    Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
    15:18:37 up 3 days, 17:33, 2 users, load average: 0.08, 0.04, 0.06; runlevel 3

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 24 2012 15:18:37 – 15:46:41
    3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10912231.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 2489.9 MWIPS (9.3 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 1688.9 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 577911.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 165388.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 820999.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 1436279.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 12403.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 5406.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3975.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 955.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 2994858.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10912231.1 935.1
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2489.9 452.7
    Execl Throughput 43.0 1688.9 392.8
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 577911.3 1459.4
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 165388.7 999.3
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 820999.0 1415.5
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1436279.6 1154.6
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 12403.8 31.0
    Process Creation 126.0 5406.1 429.1
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3975.6 937.7
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 955.7 1592.8
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 2994858.8 1996.6
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 707.5

    ————————————————————————
    Benchmark Run: Tue Apr 24 2012 15:46:41 – 16:15:23
    3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests

    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 20871304.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Double-Precision Whetstone 4877.9 MWIPS (14.0 s, 7 samples)
    Execl Throughput 5443.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 387559.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 118267.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 748044.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Pipe Throughput 3326133.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Pipe-based Context Switching 658347.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
    Process Creation 16912.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 7109.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1232.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
    System Call Overhead 5714985.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

    System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
    Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 20871304.1 1788.5
    Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4877.9 886.9
    Execl Throughput 43.0 5443.8 1266.0
    File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 387559.2 978.7
    File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 118267.4 714.6
    File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 748044.8 1289.7
    Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3326133.9 2673.7
    Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 658347.2 1645.9
    Process Creation 126.0 16912.4 1342.3
    Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7109.8 1676.8
    Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1232.2 2053.7
    System Call Overhead 15000.0 5714985.0 3810.0
    ========
    System Benchmarks Index Score 1509.9

    回覆

發表迴響

你的電子郵件位址並不會被公開。 必要欄位標記為 *

(A)  :@  (brb)  (U)  (:cc)  :S  (H)  :-(  :cute  (6)  :-#  :$  :er  8-)  FUCK 
(})  ({)  GY  (L)  :kao  (K)  :cc  :pu  (F)  :(  ^o)  :-*  :O  +o(  |-) 
:)  (*)  :D  *-)  (N)  (Y)  :P  :|  (W)  ;)  XD